Peace Movement Aotearoa Peace Movement Aotearoa (New Zealand) is essentially a service organisation which arose from a need to coordinate and support the multitude of peace groups throughout New Zealand/Aotearoa. Aims and Objectives To work in Aotearoa/New Zealand, in the Pacific region and globally towards world peace, cooperation, justice and disarmament by: * improving communication among groups and individuals * informing and educating people on peace issues and the peace movement * encouraging analysis and research for the peace movement PMA promotes peace by: * Researching and publicising peace issues such as the spy satellite stations and military bases in our country (e.g. Waihopai, Black Birch, Tangimoana and Harewood), defence spending, chemical dumping and nuclear testing in the South Pacific (e.g. Johnston Atoll, Mururoa). * Supporting Peacelink, the national magazine which carries articles on many different peace, justice and environmental issues, as well as keeps people in touch with what people are doing in Aotearoa and overseas. * Supporting peace education through the Mobile Peace Van (and we are in the process of setting up a Peace Education Resource Centre in Wellington). * Communicating with peace groups in Aotearoa/New Zealand and overseas through the Wellington office (currently we have about 300 peace groups on our mailing list). * Supplying information to news media. governmental, and political organisations. The national office is located in Wellington and provides a focus for PMA activities. Research and administration are carried out from here by volunteers, part-time and full-time workers. Extensive files and resources are maintained for the use of groups both here and abroad. General Notes: PMA was deliberately set up without any other peace groups being formally members or affiliated. The peace groups that we serve have no formal link to PMA (except that any peace people can come to the AGM each year) and are not responsible for supporting it financially. This avoids a lot of potential conflict. Groups can choose entirely for themselves whether they want any kind of relationship with PMA. Some groups have daily or weekly contact, some never make contact at all. It is important to this relationship that PMA has no policy and never makes public statements. This avoids it becoming like a super-coalition, it avoids the bad feelings of groups feeling they're being spoken for, and it saves us the hassle of groups turning up with resolutions trying to get PMA backing for their particular views (AGM's have no resolutions to argue over and there is no policy to disagree with). Now of course, in practice, there are large areas where we can work - researching, helping coordinate campaigns - which are never going to be controversial anyway. Exact priorities of where to put our (the full-time staff) effort are usually worked out in the office, are formally decided by a 'National Working Group' which is selected each year at the AGM, which is held as part of the National Peace Workshops. The Working Group oversees finances and staff appointments and general directions of work. Members of it do not represent the groups they come from, but are selected to give geographical and social spread. The National Peace Workshops are a good idea, based on the same non-hierarchical structure. This is like a national conference, but it is organised so that anyone can take a ninety minute workshop on anything they like. A timetable is worked out with several different workshops per time and people can choose what they're interested in. Since everyone is together we can set aside a time for the AGM's of PMA, Peacelink, etc. One of the most worthwhile jobs of PMA staff is regularly travelling around the country visiting peace groups: hearing what they're doing, telling them what other groups are doing and probably giving an evening talk on what is happening in the peace movement. This is part of how we cope with the unstructured system. News still flows informally between people, and if there is something important we send out a one page 'action alert' to all groups or phone around if its urgent enough. Anyone can propose a subject for an action alert. Besides PMA, united action on campaigns is possible by a series of short term, issue based coalitions. Any groups keen on an issue can join into these (with PMA help sometimes, i.e. campaign coordination role) and others will be working on something else. This allows groups that want to, to still work together on an issue without all the wrangles of people trying to win the main umbrella group to their particular cause. Generally if someone starts a good campaign, lots of other groups will want to join in. PMA's role in this is the research, information, networking, travel and so on. This means the campaigning happens outside of the structures of PMA. If someone like me is active in a particular campaign, as I often am in a spokesperson role, it is separate from my PMA job and only on behalf of the other coalition of group. Nicky Hager