Report on the Strategy Education Experiment Q. How many activists does it take to change a power structure? A. It depends how good their strategy is... Between August and November 1993, four Victorian nonviolence activists spent a total of thirty-five hours together, intensively discussing just about everything concerning nonviolent campaigns, strategies and activism. The excuse for this gathering of energies was the first Strategy Education Experiment (SEE); the activists involved were Bernadette McCartney, Margaret Pestorius, Mark Cerin and Rob Burrowes. The Experiment was organized and facilitated by Rob. The inspiration and motivation to hold the SEE came from several sources. One was Rob's belief that there are rules or principles on which nonviolent campaigns can be based, and that campaigns which do have strategies that follow these 'rules' are likely to be more effective in producing change than those which 'make up' their nonviolence as they go along. Rob has some clear ideas about how groups can develop strategies based around these principles, and the SEE was intended to share these ideas and allow discussion of them. The SEE was also designed to give the activists involved a forum in which we could share our experiences, our frustrations, our feelings and our idea about social change work, and in which we could receive support for ourselves and our work. An underlying theme of the SEE was the importance of the emotional and spiritual aspects of nonviolence, which sometimes get submerged by the intellectual/'theoretical' aspects. We tried to make sure that the SEE itself provided emotional and spiritual support for the participants. We discussed various ways in which we nurture ourselves, emotionally and spiritually; we used the beginning of each day's session as a time to catch up, to speak about what was happening in our lives and how we felt about it. For me, these honest sharings were a highlight of the SEE. We also wanted to hold a ritual as part of the SEE, and chose our stay together at Commonground as the appropriate time (in the appropriate place!). We set aside an hour early one Thursday morning, and each of us devised and facilitated our own section of the joint ritual. Despite being attacked by hordes of mosquitoes, we persevered (as activist's life is never easy). I really enjoyed the ritual. I don't often get the chance to share my understandings and feelings of spirituality with others, and it was a valuable experience to gain as an insight into the spiritual 'traditions' of the other three 'SEEers'. The intellectual content of the SEE ranged from discussion of some fairly basic 'building blocks' of nonviolence, such as our understanding of power and conflict, to examination and application of a detailed strategic framework for nonviolent struggle, developed by Rob. The topics we discussed included: what empowerment means, and how we can develop power within; our understandings of society and of 'how the world works' (particularly in terms of relations between first and third world); what conflict is, and what is required in order to deal with it; and our conceptions of nonviolence. Being activists, we also spent plenty of time talking about mundane practical issues such as how we can most successfully act in solidarity with other people's struggles; how to encourage our own groups to put time into strategy work; how we can create total nonviolent revolution; etc... We developed the 'swirl theory' of affinity group formation: the idea was that groups tend to form from preexisting networks, when energies come together in a big swirl (e.g. a gathering or large action) and then coalesce into specific projects and/or groups. Through all of this discussion, we drew heavily on our own experience as activists and people; I found that because of this, the ideas we came up with made good sense and were (mostly!) easy to understand and remember. An important part of the SEE was the time we spent getting to grips with Rob's 'strategic framework for nonviolent struggle', also known as the strategy wheel. The framework is meant to be used to generate strategic plans which can guide nonviolent struggles. The version of the framework presented during the SEE has twelve components:these include a general political and strategic assessment of the situation; determination of the organizational, leadership and coordination structures of the movement; the constructive program; the timeframe, stages and campaigns of the struggle; and the selection of tactics. A crucial distinction is between the political purpose of the struggle - i.e. 'what we want' - and the strategic aims - i.e. 'how we get it'. Rob emphasised that maintaining the group or network to carry out the struggle must be a central strategic aim for any movement. The framework is quite inclusive and detailed, and I feel that to really understand it properly I will have to apply it in the context of a campaign I am actually involved in. The SEE is the best thing I have done for a long time. I particularly enjoyed getting to know Margaret, Bernadette and Rob better, and hearing their many stories. I also enjoyed sharing my stories. I thought the quality of support we gave each other was very high. I felt excited by the new ideas and insights that we were dealing with, and I'm looking forward to using them in my work. The SEE helped me clarify my own understandings of activism, and has given me the energy to become much clearer about my personal strategy as an activist. It also reminded me how much I still have to learn about my emotional and spiritual self. Bernadette, Margaret and I have formed an informal ongoing group so we can continue to support each other as we attempt to apply some of the insights we gained from the SEE. Rob is planning to hold more SEE's in the future; the next one (depending on energy levels) is likely to be in the second half of 1994. Contact Rob for more information: phone (03) 387 3398. Mark Cerin